Showing posts with label #WriterWednesday #CathyHelm #CoverDesign #BookCover #CoverArt #AI #WritingTips #TipsAndTricks #HistoricalFiction #HistoricalNonFiction #WritingLife #WritersLife. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #WriterWednesday #CathyHelm #CoverDesign #BookCover #CoverArt #AI #WritingTips #TipsAndTricks #HistoricalFiction #HistoricalNonFiction #WritingLife #WritersLife. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 11, 2024

#WriterWednesday #CathyHelm #CoverDesign #BookCover #CoverArt #AI #PracticalTips #TipsAndTricks #HistoricalFiction #HistoricalNonFiction #WritingLife #WritersLife


AI in Book Cover Design? 

Good thing – bad thing?

by Cathy Helms of Avalon Graphics 


PART TWO

(Missed Part One? Click here...)


USING AI - THE PRACTICAL BIT

How AI relates to book cover design in particular.

I consider AI a tool much like all of the software that I utilize and the resources that I license or create on my own. I see AI as part of the process, not the 'creator' of a design. When I purchase three royalty free stock photos (and / or line art files) that I then blend/edit, color balance, etc., together to create a book cover design, I am creating something new and original from those base resources. And that is what book cover 'design' is.

What is not book cover design is buying a photo (or taking one yourself) and putting text over it for your book cover. That is only a photo with text on it. Thus, using a single AI generated 'image' is also not book cover design – not in my opinion.

A great example of how AI generated images can be used effectively in book cover design is a current top selling novel by Sarah J. Maas titled 'House of Earth and Blood'.

House of Earth and Blood

The designer purchased an RF license from Adobe Stock, and the artist lists that the wolf head was created using Adobe Firefly. At the time of writing, all of this is perfectly legal. In fact, many of the stock agencies now offer AI generators built into their sites – one must buy credits to make use of their service, and it is considered 'RF Stock' once generated. This process may change depending on how AI evolves and what precedences are set going forward with regards to artists. But right now, it is legal to purchase a license to use an AI generated image in commercial work.


So, what should an author do if against AI, but still needs a good book cover designed?

Ask up front before you hire a cover designer! Do not hire a designer without making it clear that they are not to use AI in any way. Or if you do not mind some AI used, then also make that clear to the designer before signing a contract. The design contract should also state whether or not the designer's work makes use of any AI elements.

I fully respect a potential client's wish to require that I do not use any AI tools in creating their book cover design. But that potential client must then understand that since they are refusing to allow the use of these new AI tools to assist a graphic designer in creating their vision of a book cover, then it will take longer to produce their product, and cost additional fees to cover licensing of multiple stock resources to get there. Or the client may hire a photographer, models, and rent costumes and props to achieve their desired image. Another option is to hire an illustrator to draw the cover design to their exact specifications. Often, illustrators are more expensive than traditional graphic designers because they hand draw the entire artwork, and must purchase expensive software and hardware to be able to produce the digital art. Those are the options that are available to get the job done.

Another way to use AI in the book cover design process is in creating concept designs quickly between the client and the designer. Then, once a concept is decided upon and approved by the client, the designer would license stock resources that will replace the elements from the AI concept art to become the final book cover design without using the actual AI generated image.

I do spend days piecing together concepts for my clients, using watermarked 'comps' from stock agencies at present. If I were to switch over to asking AI to give me these ideas in visual format, I could run through quite a few more ideas in short order without even opening Photoshop.

This again is using AI only as a tool and not for the finished, commercial design. An example of this is a recent project where a client wanted a photo-realistic style cover of a young Anne Boleyn writing in her journal. Of course, actual photographs of Anne Boleyn are not available since the camera wasn't invented until nearly 300 years after she died. But I was able to generate concepts using AI to show the client my layout ideas.

The client was open to using AI, but in the end, we chose an old painting of Anne that was in the public domain. The AI tool saved me time though, and gave my client excellent visuals to help them decide on what they wanted on their book cover. And searching for stock resources on any of the stock agency sites now constantly give results that include AI generated images available for licensing. So obviously they are selling AI to whomever is willing to buy them and use them.



Let's run through an example of what AI could do and how it is a good tool for a designer who has been tasked with laying out a book cover design for a project. Client wants a high country style landscape and finds this photo online:



Now say the client loves the overall photo, but doesn't want the big stone in it. I select the stone and use Photoshop's AI Generative Fill option to remove the selection and fill it in for me. AI pulls the data from the surrounding area and potentially from Adobe Stock images to accomplish the task. I then get this:



Another example as to how AI can speed up my process is selecting and isolating objects in existing stock photos:



I ask AI to select the subject in this photo, and then I can use that 'subject' in any environment. For example, place our Scotsman on a more dramatic background:



Without AI built into Photoshop, this simple two-step process would have taken me potentially hours to pull off manually, using brushes and selection tools.

In the past, I might have passed up on even considering those stock images due to the complexity of having to alter the photos to get what the client wanted. But AI tools built into Photoshop make it possible today.

And finally, I will show what AI can do on its own by giving MidJourney a prompt for a book cover idea. Let's see what I get when asking MidJourney for a Roman soldier standing in a field staring at an army across the battlefield.



As you can see, not perfect (Roman historians would likely find fault in the uniform), but it only needs some minor editing to correct AI mistakes depending on the desired use of this image. While I could find a stock photo of a field, then another of some Roman soldier who may or may not be dressed correctly for the period, and finally some soldiers is all possible. But time consuming searching for them all, and I would be asked to make multiple edits to their costumes, weapons, etc. Not to mention the hours involved trying to get all of the pieces and parts to blend together into one composition (color grading, perspective scaling, depth of field, etc.).

So, in this case, I would go with the AI generated design and edit it to suit the needs of the cover design – still color grade it, add or subtract any unwanted elements, and enhance it to make the best overall image that I could. I would go on to add the typography, properly set, and fit it to the specifications required for printing a book.

Other quick mentions of the uses of AI generators are to create custom jewelry, clothing, animals, buildings, fantasy objects, spaceships, special weapons and shapes that do not exist in real life. I can ask AI for a dragon / horse creature with gold scales and wings in a standing position – and then place that dragon into my overall layout where I have used a stock image of a castle and a stock image of the Scottish Highlands.

The possibilities are endless.




Is it ethical to use AI for a book cover?

It depends on the AI generator as of this writing. As far as I know, only Adobe assures us that their photo contributors are compensated for Adobe Firefly / Photoshop / Illustrator trolling their stock libraries for its sources. Other AI generators claim that their search engines only mine works in the public domain. But that is tough to prove and likely would not hold up in a court of law.


Will AI replace graphic designers?

Not yet. Try getting AI to set a book cover jacket for KDP (Amazon)! It is not possible. While I can get AI to give me an image with type on it, and even spell the words correctly (most of the time), I have yet to get properly set and formatted lettering out of AI. So, I feel like my job is secure for now... even if I do love to play with AI and see what sort of crazy stuff it will come up with.

(© Cathy Helms. All rights reserved.)


Many thanks for your practical insights into using AI tools (not necessarily images) to help with cover design creation, Cathy. I'm sure our followers will find this article very interesting.



Wednesday, November 27, 2024

Join The Coffee Pot Book Club on #WriterWednesday as cover designer Cathy Helms talks about AI in Book Cover Art #HistoricalFiction #WritingTips #WritersLife



AI in Book Cover Design? 

Good thing – bad thing?

by Cathy Helms of Avalon Graphics 



PART ONE

AI - The TECHNICAL BIT

Since the subject keeps popping up regularly in publishing industry circles, I'd like to offer my thoughts and experiences with AI (Artificial Intelligence) in the book cover designing area of publishing. The subject of AI often stirs strong opinions from everyone; either adamantly for or strongly against it. I do not condone the use of AI for writing novels, though, just to be clear. So, below, I share my own perspective in regards to AI in book cover design. Food for thought to those of you on the fence about AI or who might wonder how it impacts cover design.

For anyone that has been living under a rock in recent years, AI is a software program that uses a generative AI model to create images from a user's text inputs (known as prompts), usually within seconds. The results (pictures) vary in style depending on the software's capabilities, but they can typically be rendered in any style you request: photographic, illustrative, 3D, cinematic, modern, Victorian, and so on.

Initially, I was enormously excited about the potential of what I could get out of AI – how it could save me hundreds of hours editing and manipulating images to come up with finished composites for my designs. But like most everyone around the globe, I was also concerned about how and where the AI servers would data mine their sources. I certainly did not want a 'search engine' locating my digital art online and using it as a base for a new 'design' for someone else. Up until AI came along, that would have been grounds for a lawsuit against another designer for altering a commissioned design created by the original artist (no matter if it were digitally created or hand drawn). Yet, I see the many ways that AI can save me a massive amount of time by increasing efficiency in my workflow.


Scenario:

It never fails – a client chooses a royalty free stock image (or two or three) that they like overall... BUT... here is a list of edits they request, and that list is usually long.

Non-designers have always viewed Photoshop as a miracle worker of sorts:

Can't you just Photoshop that? 
Yes, but it will cost you $x 

Oh that's too much!
Well, it has taken X amount of training and X number of years for me to learn how to do that, so I am going to charge accordingly.


Clients commonly want extraordinary design work on the cheap. So, in comes AI to help meet those needs without exacting a ton of labor time by designers hunched over their keyboards, dressed in hoodies and sweats, alone in their dark caverns, drinking copious amounts of coffee, churning out magical Photoshop creations at all hours of the night.

Well, maybe the working conditions are not quite that extreme, but you get the idea.

How AI helps the graphic designer is by cutting down the labor time in editing all of those requested changes. Adobe has built in a great new tool with 'Generative Fill' (using Adobe Firefly AI), which allows the user to extend a background landscape, the sky, trees, and other supportive type features to an existing stock photo wherever needed. Without Generative Fill in Photoshop, one would spend hours duplicating, stamping, painting, and altering the canvas to achieve what Generative Fill does in a single click, or three.

It isn't perfect, and I still often need to patch up a few AI mistakes, but it is a massive production time saver for me. Not to mention that I am already paying to use it as a part of my subscription to Adobe Creative Suite as well. If I need to add a texture to my design, one click on 'Generative Fill' with a few keywords as a guide, I have it. Otherwise, I spend valuable time searching for texture resources online or making my own from scratch.

Adding texture, grain, dirt, etc, to enhance overall compositions is a longtime practice of most designers to give compositions depth and continuity. Most online texture resources are free for commercial use already. So, having AI generate it for me isn't a hill I'd choose to make a stand on for artists out there who already provide those resources for us to use without a commission.

The main case for and against the use of AI, as I see it through the lens of a designer, is the way we create the primary subjects in our compositions.

Do we continue to only acquire licensed stock images / illustrations and spend the majority of our time altering those stock resources to achieve our final product? Or do we use this new fairly effective and time saving tool that is AI in combination with stock resources to reach our goal faster?

The answer is yes. I fully expect many graphic designers to hold firm to the old ways and steer clear of AI... for now. Yet I personally find that using AI to generate parts and pieces that I need is a massive time saver, and so much easier than scouring stock libraries for days on end just for one small element required for the final design.


Can a designer get AI to give them an entire cover design in a single click?

No. Not without plenty of oddball flaws in the image, that is.


Can AI effectively and accurately produce typography for book covers?

Again, no. Absolutely not.

I have spent time trying to get good typography out of AI without any results that I would deem proper industry standard typography practices. And it has taken AI a while to learn to spell words correctly – glad the programmers found a way to do it recently through a programming key. But again, I have yet to see an AI engine that can properly kern (space) letters. And AI certainly does not know how to properly lay out a balanced design and prepare it for publication. So, graphic designers are certainly not out of a job. Yet.

But in the future? Who knows.


Is the use of an AI image generator legal?

Adobe says yes. Many traditional artists say no. I have mixed feelings about it myself. While I play with one of the top AI generators online, I do not use it commercially unless a client requests that I use it. I have had a couple of clients actually ask me to use AI elements already. And I will oblige them after explaining what we know, at present, about the legalities of AI generated images.


Below is how Adobe explains the legalities of their use:

Yes, Adobe does compensate photographers, specifically those who contribute to Adobe Stock, for using their images to train their AI model, Firefly; this compensation is provided through a "Firefly Contributor Bonus" which is based on the number of licenses generated from the images used in training the AI model.


Key points about Adobe's compensation for Firefly usage:

Source of images:

Adobe primarily uses images from their Adobe Stock library to train Firefly.

Contributor agreement:

Adobe Stock contributors are considered to have already agreed to terms allowing Adobe to use their content for training AI models under their existing license agreement.

Bonus system:

Adobe provides a specific "Firefly Contributor Bonus" to eligible Adobe Stock contributors whose images were used to train Firefly.

Calculation of bonus:

The bonus is calculated based on the total number of licenses generated from the contributor's images used in the training dataset.

Read Adobe's statement HERE!


A note for self-publish authors using KDP
(and possibly other publishing platforms):

Amazon has a box to tick if AI is used - and this does include the cover design. If the entire cover artwork was generated using an AI engine, then the author must tick that box. The author will not be penalized for using AI, but must declare it for tracking purposes. Here is the wording directly from KDP's website:

Artificial intelligence (AI) content (text, images, or translations)

We require you to inform us of AI-generated content (text, images, or translations) when you publish a new book or make edits to and republish an existing book through KDP. AI-generated images include cover and interior images and artwork. You are not required to disclose AI-assisted content. We distinguish between AI-generated and AI-assisted content as follows:

  • AI-generated: We define AI-generated content as text, images, or translations created by an AI-based tool. If you used an AI-based tool to create the actual content (whether text, images, or translations), it is considered "AI-generated," even if you applied substantial edits afterwards.
  • AI-assisted: If you created the content yourself, and used AI-based tools to edit, refine, error-check, or otherwise improve that content (whether text or images), then it is considered "AI-assisted" and not “AI-generated.”
  •  Similarly, if you used an AI-based tool to brainstorm and generate ideas, but ultimately created the text or images yourself, this is also considered "AI-assisted" and not “AI-generated.” It is not necessary to inform us of the use of such tools or processes.
  • You are responsible for verifying that all AI-generated and/or AI-assisted content adheres to all content guidelines, including by complying with all applicable intellectual property rights.


Personally, I limit my use to Adobe's built-in fill and extension AI tools which pull from Adobe's royalty free stock library (Adobe Stock) if needed to do the job.

For instance: the contributing photographers on Adobe's site are compensated if I ask Photoshop to add a bird in my design. So, my covers do not require the author to check KDP's box to indicate an  AI-generated cover design. My cover designs could contain AI-assisted elements (if I use an editing tool in the design), but I never use a fully AI generated 'image' for a cover design.

As far as the rest of the AI generators out there, some are free and some charge membership fees to use their product. If you are curious about the AI generators, here is a list containing most of them:

MidJourney (I use and pay for commercial use)

Adobe Firefly (I use and pay for commercial use)

Dall-E 2 (ImagineArt)

Stable Diffusion (OpenArt)

Generative AI by Getty Images

Meta AI

NightCafe

DreamStudio

Canva AI

(© Cathy Helms. All rights reserved.)


Coming soon:

Part Two - The Practical Bit


Thank you, Cathy, for your fascinating insights into using AI in cover art! Definitely much food for thought.


Join our...

#HistoricalFictionChat

We hope that you do not only find our advice helpful, but also join our #HistoricalFictionChat, right here, and on social media!


Today’s #HistoricalFictionChat Question:


* What are your thoughts on using AI in book cover art? *


Let us know in the comments below, or on Twitter / XIG, our FB CaféBluesky or Threads!





* Well, the Graphic Designer! *


Cathy Helms - Avalon Graphics